<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ze blog &#187; photoshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vautier.net/tag/photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vautier.net</link>
	<description>it's all blue</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rediscovering the Gimp</title>
		<link>http://blog.vautier.net/2008/11/10/rediscovering-the-gim/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vautier.net/2008/11/10/rediscovering-the-gim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Vautier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gimp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vautier.net/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It had been a while since I tried out the Gimp, probably a couple of years. Back then, being used to Photoshop, the Gimp&#8217;s interface seemed a little too fuzzy for my taste, with a plethora of tool panes that didn&#8217;t make much sense. I vaguely remember some instability too, and in short, wasn&#8217;t impressed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It had been a while since I tried out <a href="http://www.gimp.org/" target="_blank">the Gimp</a>, probably a couple of years. Back then, being used to Photoshop, the Gimp&#8217;s interface seemed a little too fuzzy for my taste, with a plethora of tool panes that didn&#8217;t make much sense. I vaguely remember some instability too, and in short, wasn&#8217;t impressed enough with the tool to keep it.</p>
<p>This past weekend, I looked at the progress update on <a href="http://www.kanzelsberger.com/pixel/?p=88" target="_blank">Pixel</a> (dead link at the moment, but a very promising product which apparently found golden angels to finance it at last), and decided to look at alternatives. I quickly stumbled across <a href="http://www.getpaint.net/" target="_blank">Paint.net</a>, an Open Source project that&#8217;s grown out of necessity, and looked at the Gimp again. I downloaded both tools, but installed the Gimp first (I think I really liked Wilber&#8217;s confused look).</p>
<p>It takes a little while to get used to the interface, but it&#8217;s been much improved since the last time I tried it. The first immediate stumbling block is how the Gimp handles layers. They&#8217;re pasted into a &#8220;floating&#8221; layer by default, and it took me a while to understand why pasting several clipboards in a row made them all end up collated into the bottom layer. Once I found out that I needed to create a new layer after pasting clipboard content, I ran into issues with the scaling tool, which produced a blank space in the overgrown area; the default highlighting scheme isn&#8217;t quite as easy to make out as it should, but I got used to it.</p>
<p>All in all, I was able to get going and do all that I usually do with Photoshop in a rather short amount of time, and was happy to notice all tools are solid and compare with my usual software.</p>
<p>Stability-wise, I only managed to make it crash once, when scaling the color palette to an unreasonably narrow width. In other words, it&#8217;s stable enough, and intuitive. Thumbs up.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t get to Paint.net yet. I blame Wilber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vautier.net/2008/11/10/rediscovering-the-gim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.185 seconds -->
